CONNECTING

[METHODOLOGY] How top1m ranks the web

A current, evidence-based view of prominence across the public web.

From observation to publication

top1m turns continuously refreshed public observations into comparable rankings, while preserving the context researchers need to understand each result.

1

Discover

Observe public web references that reveal meaningful relationships between sites.

2

Refresh

Revisit the web continuously so new and changing signals become visible.

3

Normalize

Turn repeated observations into consistent, comparable evidence.

4

Establish independence

Distinguish broad web recognition from isolated or coordinated amplification.

5

Measure prominence

Combine independent evidence into clear relative positions across the corpus.

6

Publish

Release current rankings, movement, and stable dated editions for research.

Independent sources matter more than repeated mentions.

Rich supporting context

Supporting observations deepen profiles, connect research pivots, and make the rankings more useful to explore.

DNS · WHOIS · technologies · contacts · observed resources

Four rankings, four signals

Each product describes a different layer of the web, using evidence suited to the entity being ranked.

Domains reveal registrable-site prominence.

Hosts reveal prominence at hostname level.

IPv4 and IPv6 reveal observed infrastructure visibility.

Domains

Independent web references to a registrable domain

Designed to reflect recognition across the wider web.

Hosts

Independent web references to a specific observed hostname

Shows prominence at the more precise hostname level.

IPv4

Strength and recency of observed DNS associations

Reflects the visibility of IPv4 infrastructure in collected evidence.

IPv6

Strength and recency of observed DNS associations

A separate view of IPv6 infrastructure visibility.

Integrity controls

Publication safeguards evaluate evidence quality and independence before ranks go live. When a pattern needs more confirmation, observation continues while the affected rank is held for review.

See current automated holds

Public hold status is deliberately narrow and transparent: it records a ranking publication decision while preserving the domain's research profile.

Ranking evidence
Evidence quality
Publish ranking
Continue observation

Collection and the public research profile continue in either state.

Current evidence, immutable editions

Current picture

Fresh web, DNS, WHOIS, technology, contact, and resource observations come together in profiles that show current relationships and useful research context.

Daily editions

Domains, Hosts, IPv4, and IPv6 are preserved as dated editions, giving researchers stable reference points for reproducible comparison.

What rank represents

Relative prominence across the observed public web.

  • Broad web recognition
  • Comparable positions across the corpus
  • Evidence refreshed over time
  • Stable daily reference points
  • A transparent research baseline

Built for a changing web

Coverage expands as top1m encounters new domains and infrastructure. Repeated observation keeps the public picture current, while evidence-quality safeguards support stable, meaningful comparisons over time.

How to read the data

  • Rank is most useful for comparison within the observed top1m corpus.
  • Observation dates help researchers judge the freshness of profile data.
  • Regional reachability and site access shape the coverage visible at any moment.
  • Domain, host, and infrastructure rankings provide complementary views of the web.